This document is no longer in effect. It has been archived online and is kept purely for historical purposes.
January 1, 2012
|
Post |
Post Rating Level (Effective Date) |
Temporary Level/ |
|---|---|---|
|
Abidjan, Ivory Coast |
V |
|
|
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates |
II |
|
|
Abuja, Nigeria |
V |
|
|
Accra, Ghana |
IV |
|
|
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia |
V (2012/01/01) |
|
|
Algiers, Algeria |
V |
|
|
Almaty, Kazakhstan |
IV |
|
|
Amman, Jordan |
IV |
|
|
Ankara, Turkey |
III |
|
|
Astana, Kazakhstan |
IV |
|
|
Baghdad, Iraq |
V |
50% (2005/08/01) |
|
Bamako, Mali |
V |
|
|
Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam |
II |
|
|
Bangkok, Thailand |
III |
|
|
Beijing, China |
IV |
|
|
Beirut, Lebanon |
IV |
|
|
Belgrade, Serbia |
II |
|
|
Bogotá, Colombia |
IV |
|
|
Brasilia, Brazil |
II |
|
|
Bratislava, Slovakia |
I |
|
|
Bridgetown, Barbados |
II |
|
|
Bucharest, Romania |
III |
|
|
Budapest, Hungary |
II |
|
|
Buenos Aires, Argentina |
II |
|
|
Bydgoszcz, Poland |
II |
|
|
Cairo, Egypt |
IV |
|
|
Caracas, Venezuela |
IV |
|
|
Chandigarh, India |
IV |
|
|
Chennai, India |
IV |
|
|
Chongqing, China |
V |
|
|
Clear, Alaska |
I |
|
|
Colombo, Sri Lanka |
IV |
|
|
Dakar, Senegal |
IV |
|
|
Damascus, Syria |
IV |
V (2011/03/23) |
|
Dar es Salaam, Tanzania |
IV |
|
|
Dhaka, Bangladesh |
V |
|
|
Doha, Qatar |
I |
|
|
Dubai, United Arab Emirates |
II |
|
|
Durban, South Africa |
II |
|
|
Georgetown, Guyana |
IV |
|
|
Guadalajara, Mexico |
II |
|
|
Guangzhou, China |
IV |
|
|
Guatemala, Guatemala |
V (2011/03/01) |
|
|
Hanoi, Vietnam |
IV |
|
|
Harare, Zimbabwe |
IV |
|
|
Havana, Cuba |
III (2011/11/01) |
|
|
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam |
IV |
|
|
Hong Kong, China |
I |
|
|
Islamabad, Pakistan |
V |
15% (2011/12/01) |
|
Istanbul, Turkey |
IV |
|
|
Jakarta, Indonesia |
IV |
|
|
Johannesburg, South Africa |
III |
|
|
Juba, Sudan |
V |
|
|
Kabul, Afghanistan |
V |
50% (2009/12/01) + $8,585* (2008/01/18) |
|
Kampala, Uganda |
V |
|
|
Kandahar, Afghanistan |
V |
50% (2006/03/01) + $10,015* (2008/01/18) |
|
Kathmandu, Nepal |
V |
|
|
Khartoum, Sudan |
V |
|
|
Kyiv, Ukraine |
III |
|
|
Kigali, Rwanda |
IV |
|
|
Kingston, Jamaica |
IV (2011/12/01) |
|
|
Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo |
V |
|
|
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia |
III |
|
|
Kuwait City, Kuwait |
III |
|
|
La Paz, Bolivia |
IV |
|
|
Lagos, Nigeria |
V |
|
|
Lima, Peru |
III |
|
|
Lusaka, Zambia |
IV |
|
|
Managua, Nicaragua |
III |
|
|
Manila, Philippines |
III |
|
|
Maputo, Mozambique |
IV |
|
|
Mexico, Mexico |
III |
|
|
Monterrey, Mexico |
IV |
|
|
Montevideo, Uruguay |
III (2012/01/01) |
|
|
Moscow, Russia |
IV |
|
|
Mumbai, India |
V |
|
|
Nairobi, Kenya |
IV |
|
|
Naples, Italy |
II |
|
|
New Delhi, India |
IV |
|
|
Niamey, Niger |
V |
|
|
Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso |
V |
|
|
Panama City, Panama |
II |
|
|
Port-au-Prince, Haiti |
V |
|
|
Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago |
III |
|
|
Prague, Czech Republic |
I |
|
|
Pretoria, South Africa |
III |
|
|
Quetta, Pakistan |
V |
40% (2009/02/02) |
|
Quito, Ecuador |
III |
|
|
Rabat, Morocco |
III |
|
|
Ramallah, West Bank |
V |
|
|
Recife, Brazil |
III |
|
|
Riga, Latvia |
I |
|
|
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil |
III |
|
|
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia |
IV |
|
|
San José, Costa Rica |
II (2011/11/01) |
|
|
San Salvador, El Salvador |
IV |
|
|
Santiago, Chile |
II |
|
|
Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic |
IV (2011/12/01) |
|
|
São Paulo, Brazil |
III |
|
|
Seoul, Korea |
III |
|
|
Shanghai, China |
IV |
|
|
Singapore, Singapore |
I |
|
|
Taipei, Taiwan |
III |
|
|
Tartu, Estonia |
III |
|
|
Tegucigalpa, Honduras |
IV |
|
|
Tehran, Iran |
IV |
|
|
Tel Aviv, Israel |
III |
|
|
Thule, Denmark |
II |
|
|
Tokyo, Japan |
I (2011/06/01 – 2011/11/30) |
|
|
Tripoli, Libya |
III |
V + 25% (2011/12/01) |
|
Tunis, Tunisia |
II |
|
|
Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia |
V |
|
|
Valparaiso, Chile |
II |
|
|
Vilnius, Lithuania |
I |
|
|
Warsaw, Poland |
II |
|
|
Wellington, India |
IV |
|
|
Yaoundé, Cameroon |
IV |
|
|
Zagreb, Croatia |
II |
* Special Risk Premium - FSD 58.5.1(e)
Notes:
1. The amount of post differential allowance shall be revised on the first of April each year in accordance with the methodology agreed to in the National Joint Council Committee on Foreign Service Directives, and published on the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade's website.
2. The post rating levels shall be amended by the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, on the recommendation of the appropriate foreign service interdepartmental co‑ordinating committee, as and when required, and published on the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade's website.
3. Notwithstanding Section 107 of the Public Service Labour Relations Act, revisions to this Appendix shall not constitute a change in terms and conditions of employment for employees subject to the Foreign Service Directives.